Which one is better, Prisms and Waveguides in AR glasses?

Which one is better, Prisms and Waveguides in AR glasses?

Posted by Technology Co., Ltd Shenzhen Mshilor


When comparing prisms and waveguides in AR glasses, the choice largely depends on specific application needs and design priorities. Here’s a breakdown of each:

Prisms

Advantages:

  • Simplicity of Design: Prisms can be easier to integrate and manufacture, often resulting in more straightforward optical paths.
  • Wide Field of View: They can provide a wider field of view, enhancing immersion in AR experiences.
  • High Optical Quality: Prisms typically offer good image quality with minimal distortion.

Disadvantages:

  • Size and Weight: Prisms can add bulk to the device, potentially making them less comfortable for extended use.
  • Optical Limitations: They may not manipulate light as efficiently as waveguides, which can impact brightness and clarity.

LILYGO's T-Glass is an ESP32-S3-powered wearable development platform with a smart Bosch IMU, an integrated microphone, a touch button, and a 1.1-inch full-color prism display with 126 x 126 resolution

 

Waveguides

Advantages:

  • Compact Design: Waveguides allow for thinner and lighter designs, making AR glasses more stylish and comfortable.
  • High Resolution: They can support higher pixel densities, leading to sharper images.
  • Scalability: Waveguide technology can be scaled effectively for various applications.

Disadvantages:

  • Complex Manufacturing: Fabrication processes for waveguides are generally more complex and costly.
  • Field of View: Depending on the design, waveguides may have a narrower field of view compared to prisms.TCL RayNeo X2

Conclusion

For applications prioritizing portability and sleek design, waveguides are often better. However, if image quality and a wider field of view are more critical, prisms could be the preferred choice. Ultimately, the decision depends on the specific requirements and use cases of the AR glasses.


0 comments

Leave a comment